Pennsylvania
Obama struggles to win white vote in rural Pa.
2 polls show Clinton maintaining lead in Penn.
Daily News say's Clinton won't quit, and Drudge has a headline up that says Obama isn't predicting a win.
Here's what I think ... actually, I don't know who will win ... but if Clinton wins it'll be the little piece of string connecting her to a ship that is increasingly sailing by. And she'll stay in. I think the only reason this contest is close is because Obama has skeleton after skeleton and stupid remark after stupid remark pouring out.
And he has a lot of explaining to do. Regardless of what he and Soros think about the debate last week, I thought it was great. What were they going to ask? About health care? Yeah, yeah, you both want universal health care. Iraq? Yeah, yeah you're both going to pull the troops out. Economy? You both blame George Bush and the tax cuts. They are the same. Any policy question would just have them both saying "Here me and Hillary / Barack agree, and we both want what's best for the nation."
The only thing that is different about them are their increasingly unethical friends. And by different I mean, they both have unethical friends, just not the same ones. And Hillary was smart enough not to have a pastor on tape saying "GD America."
And Bill Ayers, the terrorist, is another really close friend of Obama's who also happens to be an America hater. Reverand Wright he might be able to brush off, but two of them? I'm starting to see a pattern of who he surrounds himself with.
I imagine other voters are too. Most assuredly, John McCain sees it. And those tapes of Rev. Wright will make it into a campaign ad, mark my words.
But here's what I think. If Obama does not get the nomination, McCain wins. If Obama gets the nomination, McCain wins. And possibly in both scenarios, for 4 years we will hear that American's are racist. Because there is no way that the MSM will believe that a majority of voters wanted another Republican President. They were just racist and picked the white candidate.
My desire not to hear that for 4 to 8 years is why I'm some what hoping Barack can win. Even though I don't think he can keep his foot out of his mouth long enough to do it. The problems that we are facing in the next 4 years are too big for any of the three candidates.
As US News and World Report had on the cover last week ... it's the return of big government. That's what the people want. My father-in-law said it ... who do you think people will vote for? The guy that wants them all to work or the guy that's going to put a chicken in every pot?
And that's essentially what it will come down to. People want their expensive cars, 3,000+ homes, cell phones, DVD players, Blu Ray, iPods, designer jeans and laptop computers. They don't want to spend money on health care when they could be using that money to buy "stuff."
So tomorrow we'll find out if Hillary can stay in if she loses. I'd imagine after tomorrow her donors will dry up. She can't very well continue unfunded. But we'll see ...
2 polls show Clinton maintaining lead in Penn.
Daily News say's Clinton won't quit, and Drudge has a headline up that says Obama isn't predicting a win.
Here's what I think ... actually, I don't know who will win ... but if Clinton wins it'll be the little piece of string connecting her to a ship that is increasingly sailing by. And she'll stay in. I think the only reason this contest is close is because Obama has skeleton after skeleton and stupid remark after stupid remark pouring out.
And he has a lot of explaining to do. Regardless of what he and Soros think about the debate last week, I thought it was great. What were they going to ask? About health care? Yeah, yeah, you both want universal health care. Iraq? Yeah, yeah you're both going to pull the troops out. Economy? You both blame George Bush and the tax cuts. They are the same. Any policy question would just have them both saying "Here me and Hillary / Barack agree, and we both want what's best for the nation."
The only thing that is different about them are their increasingly unethical friends. And by different I mean, they both have unethical friends, just not the same ones. And Hillary was smart enough not to have a pastor on tape saying "GD America."
And Bill Ayers, the terrorist, is another really close friend of Obama's who also happens to be an America hater. Reverand Wright he might be able to brush off, but two of them? I'm starting to see a pattern of who he surrounds himself with.
I imagine other voters are too. Most assuredly, John McCain sees it. And those tapes of Rev. Wright will make it into a campaign ad, mark my words.
But here's what I think. If Obama does not get the nomination, McCain wins. If Obama gets the nomination, McCain wins. And possibly in both scenarios, for 4 years we will hear that American's are racist. Because there is no way that the MSM will believe that a majority of voters wanted another Republican President. They were just racist and picked the white candidate.
My desire not to hear that for 4 to 8 years is why I'm some what hoping Barack can win. Even though I don't think he can keep his foot out of his mouth long enough to do it. The problems that we are facing in the next 4 years are too big for any of the three candidates.
As US News and World Report had on the cover last week ... it's the return of big government. That's what the people want. My father-in-law said it ... who do you think people will vote for? The guy that wants them all to work or the guy that's going to put a chicken in every pot?
And that's essentially what it will come down to. People want their expensive cars, 3,000+ homes, cell phones, DVD players, Blu Ray, iPods, designer jeans and laptop computers. They don't want to spend money on health care when they could be using that money to buy "stuff."
So tomorrow we'll find out if Hillary can stay in if she loses. I'd imagine after tomorrow her donors will dry up. She can't very well continue unfunded. But we'll see ...
Comments